[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.4.5″ background_color=”#efefef”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.4.5″][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.4.5″][et_pb_accordion open_toggle_text_color=”#E71939″ open_toggle_background_color=”#ffffff” closed_toggle_text_color=”#E71939″ closed_toggle_background_color=”#ffffff” icon_color=”#e71939″ module_id=”sginfo” _builder_version=”4.9.4″ toggle_text_color=”#E71939″ toggle_font=”Open Sans|600|||||||” closed_toggle_font=”Open Sans|600|||||||” body_font=”Open Sans||||||||” body_font_size=”16px” background_color=”rgba(0,0,0,0)” hover_enabled=”0″ border_color_all=”#000000″ sticky_enabled=”0″][et_pb_accordion_item title=”Faculty Scholarship” open=”on” _builder_version=”4.9.4″ _module_preset=”default”]<\/p>\n
ºì¶¹ÊÓƵ has a distinguished faculty who are active in research and scholarship. These pages provide an overview of the scholarly and creative work of our faculty in recent years.<\/p>\n
Please note that this information was obtained from annual reports the college has provided to the University central office. The format and criteria for these reports has changed over the years, making year-to-year comparisons difficult.<\/p>\n
Please visit the Office of Graduate Studies and Research website<\/a> for a list of faculty scholarship publications.<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_accordion_item][et_pb_accordion_item title=”Grant Submission Policy and Deadlines ” _builder_version=”4.9.4″ _module_preset=”default” open=”off”]<\/p>\n All grants and contracts must be reviewed and approved by an authorized institutional official. All proposals–such as research or training grants, private foundations, or individual fellowships–must be reviewed by the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs (ORSP) before submission. Further review may be necessary by the dean, chairperson, and\/or other academic personnel. Final approval usually rests with the director of ORSP. Proposals submitted to federal or state agencies must be signed (electronically and\/or physically) by the ORSP director. Faculty interested in submitting a proposal should send us an email (cc at least one other person) with the name of the agency or program that s\/he is applying to, with information about budget and the names of any collaborators, if any. You can call us or email us to make an appointment with one of the staff members in ORSP at least three weeks before the deadline to review the guidelines, develop a budget, and discuss any other policy requirements that must be met. All proposals must undergo an internal approval process in which the chairperson(s) of the principal investigator’s department and the dean of his or her division approve the budget and proposal. For example, a project may require approval for the use of human subjects in research or need institutional resources beyond the capacities of the department or division. These issues should be resolved before a proposal is submitted externally. All proposals must reach ORSP at least five days before the agency’s deadline. A complete overview of the submission policy is described in the following policy directive:<\/p>\n Internal Deadlines for Grant Applications<\/strong> <\/span><\/p>\n Lead Time \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n ORSP highly recommends that proposals be submitted to the office several weeks before deadline. At a minimum, the principal investigator\/project director must complete and submit the Internal Approval Checklist\u00a0<\/a>15 business days prior<\/em> to the application deadline. A\u00a0completed budget, justification, and final draft of the proposal\u00a0must reach the office at least five (5) working days before the agency deadline. In addition, the Significant Financial Interest Discloure Form<\/a> must be completed prior to submission and all training through CITI<\/a> for Responsible Conduct of Research and Conflicts of Interest must be up-to-date. An Export Control Evaluation<\/a> should also be completed.<\/p>\n If ORSP does not receive the complete grant proposal at least five days prior to the agency deadline, the proposal may not be reviewed or submitted. The PI may have to wait until the next program cycle, and assumes the risk that s\/he may need to correct errors in electronic submission and that the proposal may miss the agency deadline.<\/p>\n